SWIB25 post-conference survey

Feedback
1

Dear SWIB community members – thank you so much for participating in SWIB25 and carrying on the torch! As always, we would like to get a little insight into what motivated you to attend and what your areas of interest are, and to get your feedback on how the conference went so that we know what we can still improve on. Please fill out the following anonymous survey. :point_down:

1. How did you hear about this event?

  • mailing list
  • word-of-mouth
  • personal invitation
  • social media
  • participation in a previous SWIB
  • website of ZBW
  • website of hbz
  • other
0 voters

2. In which organizational unit are you predominantly active?

  • IT / engineering
  • administration / management
  • cataloguing
  • metadata management
  • digital preservation / archiving
  • acquisition
  • subject specialization
  • information, enquiries, user training
  • research
  • studying
  • other
0 voters

3. How would you rate the overall quality of the live stream?

  • sound and video and continuity/connectivity were okay / good enough to follow comfortably
  • I had recurring problems (please add a comment with details below this survey)
0 voters

4. How many sessions did you attend?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
0 voters

5. The lectures of the event were:

1 = too difficult to understand
5 = clearly understandable

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
0 voters

6. Did you register for one of the workshops?

  • yes
  • no
0 voters

7. If you did register for a workshop: Did you attend the workshop you registered for?

  • yes
  • no
0 voters

8. If you did not attend please tell us why (otherwise just skip this question):

select all that apply

  • could not make it due to work / private issues
  • did not prepare enough
  • could not access the workshop (technical issues on participant’s side)
  • was lacking technical information how to access the system
  • was lacking organizational information (starting time, … )
  • preparatory exercises were unclear
  • other
0 voters

9. How would you rate the relevance of SWIB for your daily work?

  • relevant
  • partly relevant
  • not relevant
0 voters

10. The overall impression of the event was:

1 = very poor
5 = excellent

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
0 voters

11. In-person meet-ups as SWIB satellite events?

Since SWIB23, there has been the idea of in-person satellite events to accompany the online conference, see In-person SWIB nodes for an even better conference experience .

  • I am missing in-person meet-ups and would love to attend a SWIB node.
  • I could imagine organizing a SWIB node.
  • The online event is enough for me.
0 voters

12. Further remarks and improvement suggestions for the event

Please add any further comments as a reply below. (You can also post anonymously, for a howto see https://meta.discourse.org/t/using-anonymous-mode-to-reply-or-create-topics/240039.)